| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Honda Odyssey and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda Odyssey | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,000 mm | 2,916 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,154 mm | 4,966 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,012 mm | 1,897 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,737 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,994 kg | 1,803 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 72 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,613 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,679 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,039 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 965 mm | 0 mm | 965 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,547 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,229 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 1,077 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,087 L | 464 L | -463 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,636 L | 16.4 | -14.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,205 L | 16.4 | -12.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Odyssey
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Odyssey.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
