Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
Model | Honda Odyssey | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Minivan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,000 mm | 2,911 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,154 mm | 4,590 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,012 mm | 1,796 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,737 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,967 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 58 L | 21 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,298 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 1,283 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,613 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,679 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,039 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 965 mm | 0 mm | 965 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,547 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,229 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,077 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,087 L | 2,212 L | -1 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,636 L | 78.1 | -76.1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,205 L | 3,831 L | 1 L |
2012 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Odyssey has the best seat setup of any minivan on the market, by a large margin. Standard 8th seat, which is usable, easy to flip the 3rd row, adjustable 2nd row without floor rails to collect debris from kiddos. see full Honda Odyssey review |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 6-speed automatic FWD |
Nice and roomy 2nd row, we really like the Wide mode seating. Very nice 3rd row usable by adults. see full Honda Odyssey review |
2012 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 247-horsepower 3.5L V6 w/DoD 5-speed automatic FWD |
The seats are still more thinly padded than the competition - and the third row seat angle is merely adequate. My mother in law noted that our Ody 3rd row is really like a standard seat - not "3rd class" - but the Pacifica made her feel like she was "stuck in the back". see full Honda Odyssey review |
2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.