| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Honda Odyssey and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
| Model | Honda Odyssey | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,000 mm | 2,756 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,154 mm | 4,529 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,012 mm | 1,887 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,737 mm | 1,699 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,994 kg | 1,850 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 66 L | 13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,613 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,679 mm | 1,334 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,039 mm | 892 mm | -891 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 965 mm | 0 mm | 965 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,547 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,229 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 1,077 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 2 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,087 L | 660 L | -659 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,636 L | 23.3 | -21.3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,205 L | 1,549 L | 3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Odyssey
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Odyssey.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
