| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Honda Odyssey and 2017 Nissan Maxima Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda Odyssey | Nissan Maxima | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 w/DoD OHC-4v 248 hp@5700 250 lb-ft@4800 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@6400 261 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 109.3 in | 8.8 in |
| Length | 202.9 in | 192.8 in | 10.1 in |
| Width | 79.2 in | 73.2 in | 6 in |
| Height | 68.4 in | 56.5 in | 11.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4396 lb. | 3471 lb. | 925 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 18.0 gal. | 3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 39.4 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 64.4 in | 56.7 in | 7.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.2 in | 54.2 in | 4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 45.0 in | -4.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.5 in | 36.7 in | 2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 63.5 in | 55.7 in | 7.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 66.1 in | 53.5 in | 12.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 40.9 in | 34.2 in | 6.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.0 in | 0.0 in | 38 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 60.9 in | 0.0 in | 60.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.4 in | 0.0 in | 48.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 42.4 in | 0.0 in | 42.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 124.2 in (over 3 rows) | 79.2 in (over 2 rows) | 45 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 38.4 ft3 | 14.3 ft3 | 24.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 93.1 ft3 | 14.3 | 78.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 148.5 ft3 | 14.3 ft3 | 134.2 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Honda Odyssey
| 2015 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | I test a large crossover and think, "This third-row seat isn't bad." Then I drive a minivan and marvel at home much roomier it is inside than even the roomiest crossovers. This advantage increases the farther back in the vehicle you sit. Back in the third row, it's simply no contest. Among minivans, the Odyssey is the roomiest of the bunch. It's the only minivan with over 40 inches of legroom in each of its three rows. Total up the differences in the official specs, and the Toyota Sienna comes up nearly ten inches short (though the difference doesn't seem nearly so large in reality, maybe an inch or two). A Chrysler Town & Country? Over fourteen inches. A Toyota Highlander crossover has legroom specs similar to the Chrysler minivan, but its third row feels much more cramped. Moral of the story: don't trust the specs, sit in the cars yourself. In cabin breadth, the official specs have the Odyssey about equal to the Town & Country and a little narrower than the Sienna, but subjectively both the Honda and the Toyota feel broader and more open than the Chrysler. Then there's access to the rear rows. The feature most associated with minivans, their sliding side doors, are easier to open in tight parking spaces and provide a much larger opening. In terms of seat comfort, the Odyssey falls a little short of the Sienna, if only because it doesn't offer lounge chair-like legrests in the second row. Then again, for anyone over five feet tall to use these in the Toyota the second row seat must be slid back so far as to render the third row unusable. Either minivan has more comfortable second-row seats than most crossovers, including the Highlander, and third-row comfort is simply no contest. The Chrysler's second row seats aren't as comfortable, as they are more thinly constructed to enable them to fold beneath the floor. The Odyssey, Sienna, and Highlander can each be equipped to carry eight passengers (though the lounge seats in the Sienna eliminate one spot, and the three in the third row of the Highlander best have short legs). The Chrysler minivans can only seat seven. see full Honda Odyssey review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Honda Odyssey
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Honda Odyssey.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Nissan Maxima
| 2017 Nissan Maxima Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | Starting with the 2013 Altima and continuing with the 2015 Murano, the latest Nissans have had exceptionally comfortable front seats. The new Maxima's seats are based on the Altima's, but have some additional padding. While they don't feel as cushy and form-fitting to me as the Murano's, they're still more comfortable than the Acura TLX's front seats, which are themselves pretty good. The side bolsters are of similarly moderate size and aggressiveness in both cars, but the Maxima SR's Alcantara upholstery prevents sliding much better than the TLX's leather. see full Nissan Maxima review | |
| 2017 Nissan Maxima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| If you need an especially roomy rear seat, then the Maxima isn't your best bet. The Nissan does have an inch or two more rear knee room than the Acura TLX, and about an inch more rear headroom than the Lincoln MKZ (perhaps enough for someone six-feet tall), but the LaCrosse, Azera, and Avalon offer enough rear seat space for adults to not only fit but stretch out. see full Nissan Maxima review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Nissan Maxima
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Nissan Maxima.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
