| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Honda S2000 and 2013 BMW X5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
| Model | Honda S2000 | BMW X5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 94.5 in | 115.5 in | -21 in |
| Length | 162.2 in | 191.2 in | -29 in |
| Width | 68.9 in | 76.1 in | -7.2 in |
| Height | 50.0 in | 69.9 in | -19.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2855 lb. | 4960 lb. | -2105 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 22.5 gal. | -9.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 34.6 in | 39.3 in | -4.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.7 in | 60.0 in | -9.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 49.8 in | 0.0 in | 49.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 44.3 in | 40.0 in | 4.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 39.0 in | -39 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 58.0 in | -58 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 36.6 in | -36.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 44.3 in (over 1 rows) | 76.6 in (over 2 rows) | -32.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 5.0 ft3 | 7.1 ft3 | -2.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 5.0 | 21.9 ft3 | -16.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 5.0 ft3 | 61.8 ft3 | -56.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda S2000
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
| 2013 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | BMW's multicontour seats, a $1,300 option on six-cylinder X5s and standard with the V8, deliver a rarely matched combination of support in turns and comfort on long drives. In a reversal of traditional tendencies, the buckets in the Range Rover Sport feel firmer and less comfortable. Though you'll find a commanding view forward in either driver seat, the Range Rover Sport maintains an edge in this area. Unusually large windows are one thing that makes a Land Rover a Land Rover. see full BMW X5 review | |
| 2013 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Audi and Mercedes both offer much longer SUVs. At least until BMW fields an X7, the X5 is available with an optional third-row seat. Especially considering the size and price of the X5, said third row is absurdly tight, thinly upholstered, and difficult to access. The door openings are small, and the entire second row seat pivots forward and upward off the floor in an only partially successful attempt to compensate. To provide even minimal legroom for those using it, the second row must slide forward a few inches, to the point that its occupants find their own legroom severely compromised. Both rows are too low to the floor for adult comfort. The third-row seat optional in the Range Rover Sport probably isn't much better, and deletes the spare tire (not available on the BMW regardless). This might explain why it wasn't on the tested vehicle. If you want a usable third row, Land Rover offers the less stylish, but also much less expensive and roomier LR4. Shift focus to the second-row seat, and I found that in the smaller X3 at least as comfortable, and easier to get into and out of thanks to the more compact vehicle's lower ride height. That in the Range Rover Sport, though also not the roomiest or the most comfortable, is better than the X5's. see full BMW X5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
