Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
Model | Honda S2000 | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Convertible | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,400 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,120 mm | 4,663 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,750 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,270 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,295 kg | 1,550 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 61 L | -11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 879 mm | 955 mm | -76 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,288 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,265 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,125 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 892 mm | -892 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,298 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,130 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 851 mm | -851 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,125 mm (over 1 row) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 142 L | 294 L | -152 L |
2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.