| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Honda S2000 and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
| Model | Honda S2000 | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | 2.2L I4 DOHC-4v 177 kW@7800 220 Nm@6800 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 71 kW@5200 142 Nm@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | |
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,120 mm | 4,539 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,750 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,270 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,295 kg | 1,395 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 43 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 879 mm | 1,001 mm | 878 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,288 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,265 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,125 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 950 mm | -950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,346 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,318 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 848 mm | -848 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,125 mm (over 1 row) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 142 L | 697 L | -555 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 5.0 | 1,775 L | 4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda S2000
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
