Model Year | 2010 | 2008 | |
Model | Jeep Commander | Cadillac SRX | |
Engine | 5.7L V8 OHV-2v 357 hp@5200 389 lb-ft@4350 |
4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 320 hp@6400 315 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,781 mm | 2,957 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,788 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,900 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,826 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,292 kg | 1,951 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 78 L | 76 L | 2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,412 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,372 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 917 mm | 1,041 mm | 916 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 907 mm | 889 mm | 18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,280 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,204 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 734 mm | 615 mm | 119 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,710 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 170 L | 238 L | -68 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,031 L | 917 L | -916 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,945 L | 1,968 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Jeep Commander.
2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |