Model Year | 2021 | 2018 | |
Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee L | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,091 mm | 2,697 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,204 mm | 4,549 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,979 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,816 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,052 kg | 1,616 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 56 L | 31 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,458 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 947 mm | 0 mm | 947 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,318 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,090 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 770 mm | 0 mm | 770 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,819 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 875 L | -388 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,328 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,396 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee L.
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.