| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | 6.1L V8 OHV-2v 420 hp@6200 420 lb-ft@4800 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 321 hp@6800 274 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 109.3 in | 0.2 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 182.8 in | 3.8 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 71.1 in | 2.2 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 55.9 in | 11.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4726 lb. | 3689 lb. | 1037 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 4.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 38.6 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.2 in | 3.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 53.0 in | 4.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.5 in | -0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 36.8 in | 2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 53.9 in | 4.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 52.3 in | 8.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 33.5 in | 2 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 1.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 24.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 57.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
| 2013 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The latest 3-Series has a roomy, comfortable back seat. Cadillac didn't see this coming, and sized the ATS to compete with the previous-generation BMW. Consequently, the Cadillac's rear seat is considerably tighter than the BMW's or the Infiniti G37's, a little tighter than an A4's, about even with that in a C-Class, and roomier than that in a Lexus IS. If you want adults to be comfortable in back, the ATS isn't your car, but neither are most of the cars it competes with. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
