Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Chrysler 200 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,781 mm | 2,766 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,740 mm | 4,869 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,862 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,720 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,930 kg | 1,537 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 64 L | 15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 975 mm | 23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 919 mm | -17 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,996 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 977 L | 385 L | 592 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,909 L | 13.6 | -12.6 L |
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2014 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chrysler 200.