| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2018 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | 5.7L V8 OHV-2v 360 hp@5150 390 lb-ft@4250 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD w/low range | 4WD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,725 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,821 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,763 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,277 kg | 1,704 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 56 L | 37 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,488 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 978 mm | 20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,008 mm | 979 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,028 L | 838 L | -837 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,934 L | 1,792 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
| 2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
