Jeep Grand Cherokee (2006) vs. Lexus RX (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 Lexus RX specs.
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 Lexus RX Specifications
Model Year |
2006 |
2013 |
|
Model |
Jeep Grand Cherokee |
Lexus RX |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
109.5 in |
107.9 in |
1.6 in |
Length |
186.6 in |
187.8 in |
-1.2 in |
Width |
73.3 in |
74.2 in |
-0.9 in |
Height |
67.7 in |
66.3 in |
1.4 in |
Curb Weight |
4254 lb. |
4178 lb. |
76 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
20.8 gal. |
19.2 gal. |
1.6 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
39.7 in |
39.1 in |
0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.1 in |
58.0 in |
1.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
57.6 in |
55.5 in |
2.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.7 in |
43.1 in |
-1.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.3 in |
37.7 in |
1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
58.5 in |
57.6 in |
0.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
60.6 in |
54.5 in |
6.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
35.5 in |
36.8 in |
-1.3 in |
Total Legroom |
77.2 in (over 2 rows) |
79.9 in (over 2 rows) |
-2.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
34.5 ft3 |
40.0 ft3 |
-5.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
67.4 ft3 |
80.3 ft3 |
-12.9 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 |
4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s.
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2005 |
4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very little leg room for an adult.
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX
2013 |
Lexus have also tended to be more comfortable than competitors. The front seats in the RX are generously sized and very comfortably shaped. They're softer than those in competitors (the Cadillac SRX's buckets are borderline hard), yet are properly supportive. Though the side bolsters aren't large--only the upholstery, black with white perforations, differs from the regular RX 350--lateral support is sufficient for how the Lexus asks to be driven (we'll get to this).
see full Lexus RX review |
2013 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Probably because they were designed to fold in a single step to form a nearly flat floor, the 40-20-40 rear seats in the RX 350 aren't nearly as comfortable as the front seats. Passengers have plenty of room, but the seat cushion is too low to provide adults with thigh support and the seat back is too flat. The rear seat in the SRX isn't as roomy, and isn't much more comfortable. But I'd much rather spend time in the back seat of some other competitors.
see full Lexus RX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Lexus RX.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Jeep models.