| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2012 Lincoln MKZ Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Lincoln MKZ | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 107.4 in | 2.1 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 190.6 in | -4 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 72.2 in | 1.1 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 56.9 in | 10.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4254 lb. | 3598 lb. | 656 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 17.5 gal. | 3.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 38.7 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 57.4 in | 1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 54.0 in | 3.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.3 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 37.8 in | 1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 56.5 in | 2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 53.3 in | 7.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 37.1 in | -1.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | -2.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 16.5 ft3 | 18 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 16.5 ft3 | 50.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review | |
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
