Model Year | 2011 | 2010 | |
Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,821 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,938 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,763 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,028 kg | 1,600 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 66 L | 27 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 942 mm | -941 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,488 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 937 mm | 61 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 848 mm | 132 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,028 L | 351 L | -350 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,934 L | 12.4 | -11.4 L |
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |