| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2013 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L V6 Diesel DOHC-4v 215 hp@3800 376 lb-ft@1600 |
turbocharged 2.1L I4 Diesel DOHC-4v 200 hp@3800 369 lb-ft@1600 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 108.5 in | 1 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 178.3 in | 8.3 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 74.3 in | -1 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 66.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4389 lb. | 4246 lb. | 143 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 17.4 gal. | 3.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 39.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.2 in | 3.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 53.2 in | 4.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.4 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 39.7 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 55.4 in | 3.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 52.5 in | 8.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 35.1 in | 0.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 76.5 in (over 2 rows) | 0.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 23.3 ft3 | 11.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 54.7 ft3 | 12.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
small, tight see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
