| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2015 Nissan Quest Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Nissan Quest | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,781 mm | 3,000 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,740 mm | 5,100 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,862 mm | 1,971 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,720 mm | 1,816 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,930 kg | 1,981 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 76 L | 3 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,638 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,113 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 1,057 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,486 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,676 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 932 mm | -30 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,016 mm | -1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,554 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,260 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,029 mm | -1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,073 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 977 L | 994 L | -17 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.5 | 1,801 L | 33.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,909 L | 3,070 L | -2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
small, tight see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Nissan Quest
| 2015 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 260-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT FWD |
Here's the main reason I bought this van: my kids! Of all the vans we tested, they believed the second and third row seats were the most comfortable. Some may laugh at the boxy shape and fat rear end of the Quest, but the reason it's designed that way is because it maximizes interior room. I'm 6'1" (taller in the torso than legs) and even I think the van is spacious when I sit in the third row. The head and shoulder room is incredible. The seats are all very comfortable. The soft suspension makes riding as a passenger a pleasure. So, despite all the shortcomings I mention in this review, in my opinion, the Quest tops all the competitors in the category of passenger and driver comfort. The pleasing and luxurious interior materials contribute to this. Too bad the production of this iteration of the Quest appears to be in its final chapter. see full Nissan Quest review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
