Jeep Grand Cherokee (2012) vs. Subaru Outback (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2016 Subaru Outback specs.
2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2016 Subaru Outback Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Jeep Grand Cherokee |
Subaru Outback |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Wagon |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
114.8 in |
108.1 in |
6.7 in |
Length |
189.8 in |
189.6 in |
0.2 in |
Width |
76.3 in |
72.4 in |
3.9 in |
Height |
69.4 in |
66.1 in |
3.3 in |
Curb Weight |
4470 lb. |
3593 lb. |
877 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
24.6 gal. |
18.5 gal. |
6.1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.0 in |
40.8 in |
-0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
58.6 in |
58.1 in |
0.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
57.0 in |
55.5 in |
1.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
40.3 in |
42.9 in |
-2.6 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.3 in |
38.9 in |
0.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
58.0 in |
57.3 in |
0.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
56.5 in |
55.0 in |
1.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
38.6 in |
38.1 in |
0.5 in |
Total Legroom |
78.9 in (over 2 rows) |
81 in (over 2 rows) |
-2.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
36.3 ft3 |
35.5 ft3 |
0.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
68.3 ft3 |
73.3 ft3 |
-5 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
2013 |
You can buy a BMW X5 or Porsche Cayenne with tame front seats, but not the Grand Cherokee SRT8. In the Jeep, SRT's signature buckets are standard. Large, firm bolsters provide excellent lateral support even to those of us with slender builds. Yet they're also comfortable, with enough padding to avoid park bench references. The four-way adjustable lumbar didn't do much for my back, but your experience may vary. Moving to the back seat, the Grand Cherokee's growth adds a couple of badly needed inches to legroom. With this improvement the Grand Cherokee only matches other similarly sized SUVs, so it's not a reason to buy. But rear seat legroom is no longer a reason not to buy, so it bears mentioning.
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
2011 |
4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable.
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 |
4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2011 |
4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 |
4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer.
see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Outback
2015 |
Through the 2009 model year, the Outback (and the related Legacy sedan) had a tight back seat. Though marketed as a midsize car, it was actually a compact. The 2010 redesign dramatically expanded the Outback's interior, especially in the back seat. The 2015 redesign added another inch of shoulder room, such that the Outback (and Legacy) are now not only truly midsize, but rank among the roomiest midsize cars. Rear air vents are offered--in Outbacks with leather. So the tested car lacked them.
Some compact crossovers, including the Cherokee, are about as roomy, but they achieve their specs through a more upright seating position. People in the back seat are closer to the front seats, so they don't feel like they have as much room even though they have just as much space for their legs. But they get rear air vents even in the lower trim levels.
see full Subaru Outback review |
2016 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The front seats have an unusually high bulge just below my shoulder blades. This feels more odd than uncomfortable, at least to me. The driver's lumbar adjusts, but this affects the area below said bulge. Partly depending on your height your experience might vary. These seats also provide very little lateral support, which admittedly isn't much of an issue given the non-sporting character (and non-sporting tires) of the Outback.
I had no such qualms with the armrest on the door. It's wide and cushy.
In the front seats' favor, for 2015 Subaru has added fore-aft adjustability to the headrests, a rarity in recent moderately priced cars.
The Jeep's cloth seats are too squishy, but they're more form-fittting than the Subaru's, and I find them more comfortable.
see full Subaru Outback review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Outback
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Jeep models.