| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.5 in | 102.4 in | 7.1 in |
| Length | 186.6 in | 171.9 in | 14.7 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 69.5 in | 3.8 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 61.4 in | 6.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 4254 lb. | 2865 lb. | 1389 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.8 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 7.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 40.5 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 53.3 in | 5.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 52.3 in | 5.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.6 in | 0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 39.3 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.5 in | 52.6 in | 5.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.6 in | 43.7 in | 16.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.5 in | 36.2 in | -0.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -0.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.5 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | 14.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 67.4 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | 5.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very comfortable driving. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Very little leg room for an adult. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
