Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
Model | Jeep Grand Cherokee | Toyota Matrix | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,821 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,943 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,760 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,062 kg | 1,300 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 50 L | 43 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 998 mm | -2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,427 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 919 mm | 61 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,028 L | 561 L | -560 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,934 L | 1,741 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |