Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
Model | Jeep Wrangler | Cadillac CTS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr SUV, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 103.4 in | 113.4 in | -10 in |
Length | 167.0 in | 191.6 in | -24.6 in |
Width | 66.7 in | 72.5 in | -5.8 in |
Height | 71.2 in | 58.0 in | 13.2 in |
Curb Weight | 3694 lb. | 3851 lb. | -157 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 18.0 gal. | 1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 38.8 in | 3.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.8 in | 56.7 in | -5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.8 in | 55.1 in | -3.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 42.4 in | -1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 40.6 in | 37.2 in | 3.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.3 in | 54.7 in | 2.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 42.7 in | 54.1 in | -11.4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.7 in | 35.9 in | 0.8 in |
Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | -0.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 29.5 ft3 | 13.6 ft3 | 15.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.3 ft3 | 13.6 ft3 | 49.7 ft3 |
2006 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Still small, despite the increased size of the vehicle. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2006 | 2dr SUV, ext. 190-horsepower 4.0L I6 6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range |
There is not much rear leg room and the seat has you sitting straight up instead of slight recline. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2006 | 2dr SUV 190-horsepower 4.0L I6 6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Comfortable but not a lot of leg room see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2013 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The first two generations of the CTS were "in between" cars larger than a BMW 3-Series but more compact than a BMW 5-Series. Contented and priced like the former, they weren't pitched as competitors to the latter. With the third-generation sedan this has changed. The new CTS leaves the 3er for the ATS and goes head-to-head with the 5er. However, the 2014's exterior and interior are only a bit more expansive than those of the 2008-2013 car. Also, the rear doors do not open wide enough for easy entry. You'll still find a roomier, more comfortable, easier to access rear seat in the 5-Series, even if the official specs suggest otherwise. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2013 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review |