| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Jeep Wrangler and 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Jeep Wrangler | Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 106.3 in | 9.7 in |
| Length | 184.4 in | 183.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 70.5 in | 3.4 in |
| Height | 72.3 in | 57.4 in | 14.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4180 lb. | 2835 lb. | 1345 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.6 gal. | 13.7 gal. | 7.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 38.9 in | 2.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 54.9 in | 0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 53.2 in | 2.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 42.0 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.3 in | 37.3 in | 3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.8 in | 53.2 in | 3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.7 in | 51.9 in | 4.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 36.1 in | 1.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 0.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 46.4 ft3 | 14.8 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 82.0 ft3 | 14.8 ft3 | 67.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Jeep Wrangler
| 2011 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr SUV 285-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Even tho there are rear seats, I would never ride in back, too small back there. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze
| 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The old Chevrolet Cruze, like the Ford Focus, had a rear seat on the tight side even by compact sedan standards. According to the specs, the new one has only gained a few tenths of legroom. But the improvement feels much larger. Chevrolet claims that rear knee room (not a standard spec) has increased by two inches, and this aligns much better with my perceptions. Some competitors, including the Honda Civic, continue to offer more rear seat space. But the new Cruze's back seat could be the most comfortable in the class for two average-sized men. With a position well above the floor, the rear seat cushion provides much better thigh support than the typical sedan, much less the typical compact sedan. The Civic has a lower rear cushion and insufficient foot space under its front seats, squandering its on-paper legroom advantage. Up front the Cruze has comfortable seats (though, like those in the Civic, without adjustable lumbar support) but shoulder room typical of a compact car. The Civic has two more inches of shoulder room and feels more like a midsize sedan in the front seat. Both cars have good driving positions with reasonably compact instrument panels. In L and LS trim, the new Cruze has a 14.9-cubic-foot trunk, nearly identical to that of the new Civic and about as large as you'll find in the class. But the LT and Premier have a compact spare tire that reduces cargo volume to 13.6 cubic feet. Still pretty good. Next year both cars will also be available as hatchbacks. see full Chevrolet Cruze review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
