Jeep Wrangler Jeep Wrangler 2010 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Jeep Wrangler (2010) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Jeep Wrangler and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque specs.

2010 Jeep Wrangler and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications

Model Year 2010 2013  
Model Jeep Wrangler Land Rover Range Rover Evoque  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 116.0 in 104.8 in 11.2 in
Length 184.4 in 171.5 in 12.9 in
Width 73.9 in 77.4 in -3.5 in
Height 72.3 in 64.4 in 7.9 in
Curb Weight 4180 lb. 3680 lb. 500 lb.
Fuel Capacity 21.6 gal. 18.5 gal. 3.1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 41.3 in 40.3 in 1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 55.8 in 56.6 in -0.8 in
Hip Room, Row 1 55.6 in 0.0 in 55.6 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.0 in 43.1 in -2.1 in
Headroom, Row 2 40.3 in 39.7 in 0.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 56.8 in 55.4 in 1.4 in
Hip Room, Row 2 56.7 in 0.0 in 56.7 in
Legroom, Row 2 37.2 in 35.7 in 1.5 in
Total Legroom 78.2 in (over 2 rows) 78.8 in (over 2 rows) -0.6 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 46.4 ft3 20.3 ft3 26.1 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 82.0 ft3 51.0 ft3 31 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Jeep Wrangler

2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
It is big enough that I can take three passengers in relative comfort, considering the type of vehicle that it is. see full Jeep Wrangler review
2010 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.