| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Jeep Wrangler and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2012 | |
| Model | Jeep Wrangler | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,007 mm | 2,875 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 4,785 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,875 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,869 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,903 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 81 L | 76 L | 5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,415 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,369 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,059 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,440 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,011 mm | 972 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,019 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 898 L | 487 L | 411 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 31.7 | 1,368 L | 30.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,050 L | 2,852 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Jeep Wrangler
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Jeep Wrangler.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Jeep models.
