Kia K900 (2017) vs. Kia Optima (2012) Specs

vs.

◆

2017 Kia K900 and 2012 Kia Optima Specifications

Model Year	2017	2012
Model	Kia K900	Kia Optima
Engine	5.0L V8 DOHC-4v 420 hp@6400 376 lb-ft@5000	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 274 hp@6000 269 lb-ft@1750
Transmission	8-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	RWD	FWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr Sedan
			Difference
Wheelbase	3,045 mm	2,794 mm	1 mm
Length	5,095 mm	4,844 mm	1 mm
Width	1,900 mm	1,831 mm	0 mm
Height	1,486 mm	1,455 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	2,172 kg	1,535 kg	1 kg
Fuel Capacity	75 L	70 L	5 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,021 mm	1,016 mm	0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,501 mm	1,453 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,420 mm	1,389 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,166 mm	1,156 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	955 mm	955 mm	0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,453 mm	1,415 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,415 mm	1,384 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	970 mm	881 mm	89 mm
Total Legroom	2,136 mm (over 2 rows)	2,037 mm (over 2 rows)	0 mm
Cargo Volume	450 L	436 L	14 L

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Kia K900.

2012 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.