(2016) vs. Mazda CX-9 (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 and 2012 Mazda CX-9 specs.
2016 and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2012 |
|
Model |
|
Mazda CX-9 |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016
2017 |
The Kia Niro's compact exterior dimensions somehow contain plentiful headroom and legroom in both rows. Beyond the measurements, the rear seat is positioned at an unusually comfortable height, affording both excellent leg support and an open view forward over the front seats.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 .
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Kia models.