| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Kia Optima and 2019 Mazda CX-3 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2019 | |
| Model | Kia Optima | Mazda CX-3 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,570 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,844 mm | 4,275 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,831 mm | 1,768 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,455 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,454 kg | 1,274 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 48 L | 22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,359 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,389 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,156 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 945 mm | 10 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,280 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,245 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 889 mm | -8 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,037 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 351 L | 85 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 1,260 L | 14.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima
| 2012 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-3.
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
