Model Year | 2013 | 2020 | |
Model | Kia Optima | Nissan Armada | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 274 hp@6000 269 lb-ft@1750 |
5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 390 hp@5800 394 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,844 mm | 5,306 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,831 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,455 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,535 kg | 2,529 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 98 L | -28 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,621 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,389 mm | 1,504 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,156 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 1,016 mm | 954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,610 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 1,041 mm | 880 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 925 mm | -925 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,537 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,240 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 721 mm | -721 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,037 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 467 L | -31 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.4 | 1,413 L | 14.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 2,701 L | 13.4 |
2013 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Nissan Armada.