Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
Model | Kia Optima | Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 2,690 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,844 mm | 4,671 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,831 mm | 1,895 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,455 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,454 kg | 1,837 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 72 L | -2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,389 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,156 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 1,024 mm | 954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,295 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 795 mm | 86 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,037 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,859 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 790 L | -354 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 1,892 L | 14.4 |
2012 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Kia Optima.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser.