| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Kia Rondo and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
| Model | Kia Rondo | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 114.8 in | -8.5 in |
| Length | 179.0 in | 195.5 in | -16.5 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 74.7 in | -3 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 57.9 in | 9.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3333 lb. | 3997 lb. | -664 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.8 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 38.7 in | 2.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 59.1 in | -59.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 57.2 in | -2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.3 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 41.6 in | 38.0 in | 3.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 59.0 in | -59 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 58.0 in | -4.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.2 in | 39.7 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.1 in | 0.0 in | 35.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 40.3 in | 0.0 in | 40.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 31.3 in | 0.0 in | 31.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 110.8 in (over 3 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 28.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 6.5 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -9.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 31.7 ft3 | 16.4 | 15.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 74.0 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 57.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Kia Rondo
| 2009 Kia Rondo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 182-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Tall large people can sit in the second row with more comfort as they can in the front seats of our Honda Civic or Sebring convertible. Third row is not bad for short trips for adults and children would be good for longer trips. see full Kia Rondo review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Kia models.
