Model Year | 2009 | 2006 | |
Model | Land Rover LR2 | Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 104.7 in | 110.5 in | -5.8 in |
Length | 177.1 in | 200.4 in | -23.3 in |
Width | 75.1 in | 72.9 in | 2.2 in |
Height | 68.5 in | 58.7 in | 9.8 in |
Curb Weight | 4255 lb. | 3553 lb. | 702 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 17.5 gal. | 1 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.2 in | 39.4 in | 0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 58.7 in | -1.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.4 in | -56.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 42.3 in | -0.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 37.8 in | 1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.3 in | 58.6 in | -1.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 57.2 in | -57.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 37.6 in | -1.2 in |
Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 79.9 in (over 2 rows) | -1.6 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 26.7 ft3 | 18.6 ft3 | 8.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 59.0 ft3 | 18.6 ft3 | 40.4 ft3 |
2009 Land Rover LR2 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Excellent seat height as well as seat back position. Good leg room and head room. see full Land Rover LR2 review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Comfortable seat position, soft leather. Plenty of room and very adjustable. see full Land Rover LR2 review |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |