Land Rover LR2 (2010) vs. Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo (2004) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Land Rover LR2 and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo specs.
2010 Land Rover LR2 and 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Specifications
Model Year |
2010 |
2004 |
|
Model |
Land Rover LR2 |
Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Land Rover LR2
2009 |
4dr SUV 230-horsepower 3.2L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Excellent seat height as well as seat back position. Good leg room and head room.
see full Land Rover LR2 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
2005 |
4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Land Rover models.