Land Rover LR4 (2012) vs. GMC Terrain (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Land Rover LR4 and 2015 GMC Terrain specs.
2012 Land Rover LR4 and 2015 GMC Terrain Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2015 |
|
Model |
Land Rover LR4 |
GMC Terrain |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
113.6 in |
112.5 in |
1.1 in |
Length |
190.1 in |
185.3 in |
4.8 in |
Width |
75.4 in |
72.8 in |
2.6 in |
Height |
74.1 in |
66.3 in |
7.8 in |
Curb Weight |
5659 lb. |
3853 lb. |
1806 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
22.8 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.4 in |
39.8 in |
0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.0 in |
55.7 in |
3.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
0.0 in |
55.1 in |
-55.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
42.4 in |
41.2 in |
1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
42.4 in |
39.2 in |
3.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
59.2 in |
55.3 in |
3.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
0.0 in |
51.3 in |
-51.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
37.6 in |
39.9 in |
-2.3 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
40.1 in |
0.0 in |
40.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
42.8 in |
0.0 in |
42.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
36.3 in |
0.0 in |
36.3 in |
Total Legroom |
116.3 in (over 3 rows) |
81.1 in (over 2 rows) |
35.2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
9.9 ft3 |
31.6 ft3 |
-21.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
44.5 ft3 |
31.6 |
12.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
87.4 ft3 |
63.9 ft3 |
23.5 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover LR4
2012 |
4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Perfect family car. fold down seats that, because of the raised headline, are usable by adults. large cargo area, 3rd row a/c....
see full Land Rover LR4 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 GMC Terrain
2015 |
4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought.
see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Land Rover models.