| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Land Rover LR4 and 2017 Lexus RX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
| Model | Land Rover LR4 | Lexus RX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.6 in | 109.8 in | 3.8 in |
| Length | 190.1 in | 192.5 in | -2.4 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 74.6 in | 0.8 in |
| Height | 74.1 in | 67.7 in | 6.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 5659 lb. | 4222 lb. | 1437 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.8 gal. | 19.2 gal. | 3.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.4 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 57.8 in | 1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.6 in | -56.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 44.1 in | -1.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 42.4 in | 39.1 in | 3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.2 in | 57.6 in | 1.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.1 in | -56.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 38.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 40.1 in | 0.0 in | 40.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 42.8 in | 0.0 in | 42.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 116.3 in (over 3 rows) | 82.1 in (over 2 rows) | 34.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.9 ft3 | 18.4 ft3 | -8.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 44.5 ft3 | 18.4 | 26.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 87.4 ft3 | 56.3 ft3 | 31.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Land Rover LR4
| 2010 Land Rover LR4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Drivers left leg can bang against some door hardware. This needs some minor re-think. Otherwise a nice elevated driving and upright position with tremendous forward visibility. Front pillar does not cause much of a blind spot. see full Land Rover LR4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Lexus RX
| 2017 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Lexus RX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Lexus RX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
