Model Year | 2014 | 2017 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Audi Q7 | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
supercharged 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 333 hp@5500 325 lb-ft@2900 |
|
Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,662 mm | 2,995 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,356 mm | 5,070 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,966 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,636 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,669 kg | 2,240 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 85 L | -15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 986 mm | -79 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 912 mm | -912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,255 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 742 mm | -742 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,786 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 575 L | 419 L | 156 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.3 | 1,062 L | 19.3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,444 L | 2,027 L | -1 L |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
2017 Audi Q7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Now that the Audi Q7's price and styling have been given their due, my other "why nots" are much less clear cut. You sit SUV-high in the new Audi Q7, even higher (if memory serves) than in the Volvo, and certainly higher than in the relatively car-like Acura. While the commanding view over traffic will appeal to many drivers, they're less likely to enjoy the Q7's high floor. The step up won't be an easy one for shorter or older drivers. They'll want running boards. For such a beamy vehicle, with about two inches more shoulder room than in the far-from-narrow Volvo XC90, the Audi Q7 has unexpectedly little stretch out room in the front seats. The culprit: an unusually high and wide center console. The XC90, with a much narrower and lower console, feels roomier--but not as sporty. see full Audi Q7 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Audi Q7.