| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2014 Ford Expedition Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Ford Expedition | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
5.4L V8 OHC-2v 310 hp@5000 365 lb-ft@3600 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD w/low range | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 119.0 in | -14.2 in |
| Length | 171.5 in | 206.5 in | -35 in |
| Width | 77.4 in | 78.8 in | -1.4 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 77.2 in | -12.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 5805 lb. | -2125 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 28.0 gal. | -9.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 39.6 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 63.2 in | -6.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 60.2 in | -60.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 41.1 in | 2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 39.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 63.7 in | -8.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 59.9 in | -59.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 39.1 in | -3.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 51.9 in | -51.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.2 in | -50.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.7 in | -37.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 117.9 in (over 3 rows) | -39.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 18.6 ft3 | 1.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.3 | 55.0 ft3 | -34.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 108.3 ft3 | -57.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Expedition
| 2014 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 0 | The driven Limited trim had black heated and cooled front seats. The cooling was necessary in the summertime Texas heat and perfomed well - I turned them on every time I got in the car (unlike the Lexus system, that you can leave on as it is a dial, you have to activate the cooling every single time you restart the car). These thrones were comfortable for a 4 hour drive - there was more room for someone who has more girth than I. Also, adjustable pedals are a great Ford innovation that I wish more manufacturers would include. My wife (who is 11 inches shorter than me) could easily drive this beast comfortably, without sitting too close to the steering wheel. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2014 | 0 | Both the second and third rows have ample room, with and without kid's car seats, for three across. The third row isn't an afterthought like in other SUVs and even 5'11" adults are happy back there. Additionally, the vents provide adequate AC in 100+ degree heat. There are plenty of easily accessible LATCH anchors if you wish (although seatbelts are generally just as easy and have a higher weight rating with car seats than the LATCH anchors). Most minivans (except the Odyssey) do not have LATCH in the center of the second row - only on the outboard - and only have LATCH in the center of the third row. The Expedition (and Odyssey) is nice because they are flexible where you can put car seats comfortably. see full Ford Expedition review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
