| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2008 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Ford Explorer Sport Trac | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
4.6L V8 OHC-3v 292 hp@5750 300 lb-ft@3950 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUT | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 130.5 in | -25.7 in |
| Length | 171.5 in | 210.2 in | -38.7 in |
| Width | 77.4 in | 73.7 in | 3.7 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 72.5 in | -8.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 4793 lb. | -1113 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 22.5 gal. | -4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 39.8 in | 0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 59.0 in | -2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.4 in | -55.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 42.4 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 38.5 in | 1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 58.9 in | -3.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.5 in | -55.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 36.9 in | -1.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 79.3 in (over 2 rows) | -0.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 0.0 | 20.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 0.0 | 51 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac
| 2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review |
| 2008 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
So bad I can't drive it much more than the 4 miles to and from work. The front seats are so hard that the first couple times I drove it I couldn't figure out why my feet were so cold. Because the circulation below my knees was being cutoff. I have tried extra cushions for the seat bottom and I have found something that really helps, but on longer drives, combined with the firm ride - bring your Advil. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
