Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Jeep Wrangler | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 116.0 in | -11.2 in |
Length | 171.5 in | 184.4 in | -12.9 in |
Width | 78.1 in | 73.9 in | 4.2 in |
Height | 64.4 in | 72.3 in | -7.9 in |
Curb Weight | 3655 lb. | 4180 lb. | -525 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.1 gal. | 21.6 gal. | -3.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 41.3 in | -1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 55.8 in | 0.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.6 in | -55.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 41.0 in | 2.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 40.3 in | -0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 56.8 in | -1.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.7 in | -56.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 37.2 in | -1.5 in |
Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 0.6 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 46.4 ft3 | -26.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 82.0 ft3 | -31 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
2011 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr SUV 285-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Even tho there are rear seats, I would never ride in back, too small back there. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It has the ability to go back and forth but not tilt the base seat. Firm but not being able to adjust the angle (like electric 10 way) makes a difference for tall and full frame people. I will be looking to adjust angle asap. see full Jeep Wrangler review |