| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2009 Kia Rondo Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2009 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Kia Rondo | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 177 kW@5500 340 Nm@1750 |
2.7L V6 DOHC-4v 143 kW@6000 249 Nm@4500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,662 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,356 mm | 4,547 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,966 mm | 1,821 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,636 mm | 1,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,669 kg | 1,562 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 60 L | 10 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,387 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,369 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 970 mm | -63 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 892 mm | -892 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,024 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 795 mm | -795 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,814 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 575 L | 184 L | 391 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.3 | 898 L | -877.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,444 L | 2,095 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Kia Rondo
| 2009 Kia Rondo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 182-horsepower 2.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Tall large people can sit in the second row with more comfort as they can in the front seats of our Honda Civic or Sebring convertible. Third row is not bad for short trips for adults and children would be good for longer trips. see full Kia Rondo review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
