Model Year | 2023 | 2011 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mazda CX-9 | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 246 hp@5500 269 lb-ft@1300 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 273 hp@6250 270 lb-ft@4250 |
|
Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 105.6 in | 113.2 in | -7.6 in |
Length | 172.1 in | 200.2 in | -28.1 in |
Width | 75.0 in | 76.2 in | -1.2 in |
Height | 64.9 in | 68.0 in | -3.1 in |
Curb Weight | 3935 lb. | 4546 lb. | -611 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 20.1 gal. | -2.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.6 in | -0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 59.4 in | -2.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 56.5 in | -56.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 40.9 in | -0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.0 in | -0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 58.7 in | -3.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 56.0 in | -56 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 33.8 in | 39.8 in | -6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.4 in | -35.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 56.9 in | -56.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 43.7 in | -43.7 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 32.4 in | -32.4 in |
Total Legroom | 73.8 in (over 2 rows) | 113.1 in (over 3 rows) | -39.3 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 21.5 ft3 | 17.2 ft3 | 4.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 21.5 | 48.3 ft3 | -26.8 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 50.5 ft3 | 100.7 ft3 | -50.2 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |