| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2010 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 108.7 in | -3.9 in |
| Length | 171.5 in | 182.3 in | -10.8 in |
| Width | 77.4 in | 69.7 in | 7.7 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 56.3 in | 8.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3527 lb. | 153 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 17.4 gal. | 1.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 37.1 in | 3.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 54.7 in | 1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 52.3 in | -52.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 41.7 in | 1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 36.9 in | 2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 55.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 54.9 in | -54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 33.4 in | 2.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 3.7 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 7.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 38.6 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
