Model Year | 2014 | 2011 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,662 mm | 2,560 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,356 mm | 4,582 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,966 mm | 1,816 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,636 mm | 1,298 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,669 kg | 1,914 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 80 L | -10 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 958 mm | -957 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,369 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,090 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 0 mm | 907 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,090 mm (over 1 row) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 575 L | 204 L | 371 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,444 L | 289 L | -288 L |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL.