Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2012) vs. Volkswagen Golf / GTI (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2015 Volkswagen Golf / GTI specs.
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2015 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2015 |
|
Model |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
Volkswagen Golf / GTI |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Wagon |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
104.8 in |
103.5 in |
1.3 in |
Length |
171.5 in |
179.6 in |
-8.1 in |
Width |
77.4 in |
70.8 in |
6.6 in |
Height |
64.4 in |
58.3 in |
6.1 in |
Curb Weight |
3680 lb. |
3063 lb. |
617 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
18.5 gal. |
13.2 gal. |
5.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
40.3 in |
38.6 in |
1.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
56.6 in |
55.9 in |
0.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
43.1 in |
41.2 in |
1.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.7 in |
38.6 in |
1.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
55.4 in |
53.9 in |
1.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
35.7 in |
35.6 in |
0.1 in |
Total Legroom |
78.8 in (over 2 rows) |
76.8 in (over 2 rows) |
2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
20.3 ft3 |
30.4 ft3 |
-10.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
51.0 ft3 |
66.5 ft3 |
-15.5 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive.
see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2012 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably.
see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
2015 |
The original Golf revolutionized the automotive world by demonstrating how practical a small car could be. Though the latest, seventh-generation Golf is much larger than the original, and every major auto maker now offers a Golf-like compact, the Volkswagen continues to impress with its practicality.
Let's start with the front seat. The seat itself is shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The performance buckets in the GTI and R have firmer bolsters that provide more lateral support, but the regular Golf's buckets are cushier and more comfortably contoured. The e-Golf uses the same exemplary seats. In comparison, the seats in the Soul EV are merely okay.
The view forward from the e-Golf's driver seat is also about as good as it gets in a current compact, with a reasonably-sized instrument panel and an expansive, comfortably raked windshield flanked by relatively thin pillars. This said, some people might prefer the higher driving position in the quasi-crossover Soul EV. For me, a conventional car's lower position continues to feel more natural, especially in turns.
Battery packs take up space. Even with the (roughly) 1.5-kWh battery packs used by hybrids cargo capacity usually takes a hit. In the Soul EV, rear seat legroom suffers a three-inch reduction due to the underfloor location of the car's 27-kWh battery pack. But VW engineers managed to design and package a 24-kWh battery pack so cleverly that the e-Golf's passenger and cargo room are identical to those of a regular Golf. Adults will comfortably fit in the car's back seat. The same can't be said about most other EVs--the Soul being a second exception. Even with the three-inch cut, the Kia's back seat is about as roomy as the Golf's. The i3's back seat is far tighter.
Which EV treats its passengers best depends on the season. The e-Golf includes rear air vents, while the Soul EV+ includes rear seat bun warmers.
Moving to the cargo area, the Soul EV's battery pack eats up a dozen cubic feet, leaving just under 50. The uncompromised e-Golf can contain a couple more. But these figures don't convey the differing proportions of the cars' cargo holds. The e-Golf's is a few inches longer, while the Soul EV's is a few inches taller. Which is the better cargo hauler depends on the shape of your cargo.
The much larger Tesla Model S can hold a few more cubic feet, the Mercedes-Benz B-Class about the same as the e-Golf. No other EV comes close, especially not the 12-cube BMW i3.
see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Golf / GTI