

Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,973 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,956 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,877 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,584 kg | 1,636 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 51 L | 55 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,041 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,560 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,572 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 1,026 mm | 987 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,001 mm | 972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,524 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,547 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 927 mm | -25 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,890 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 991 L | 694 L | 297 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 994 L | 24.5 | 969.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,101 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford C-MAX.