Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover | Jeep Cherokee | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,921 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,999 mm | 4,623 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,984 mm | 1,859 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,836 mm | 1,669 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,200 kg | 1,729 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 105 L | 60 L | 45 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,001 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,542 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,367 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,044 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 978 mm | 18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,509 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,267 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,101 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,068 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 909 L | 702 L | 207 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,030 L | 1,555 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Jeep Cherokee.