Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover | Volkswagen Tiguan | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,604 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,973 mm | 4,432 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,956 mm | 1,808 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,877 mm | 1,666 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,584 kg | 1,544 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 64 L | 42 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 993 mm | 5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,560 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,572 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 1,019 mm | 987 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 991 mm | -18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,524 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,547 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 909 mm | -7 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,890 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,928 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 991 L | 674 L | 317 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 994 L | 23.8 | 970.2 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,101 L | 1,589 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Land Rover Range Rover.
2015 Volkswagen Tiguan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Based on the specs, the Tiguan suffers from insufficient dimensions. It's 3.6 inches less lengthy than the Escape, and as a result has an inch less legroom. And the Ford falls near the bottom of the segment in this spec. In the real world, though, the Tiguan's rear seat feels roomier and more comfortable than the Escape's and in the ballpark with the class leaders. A relatively large seat bottom is high enough off the floor to provide adults with thigh support. The rear seat back is more comfortably shaped than the compact crossover norm, and reclines. One nit: hard plastic isn't the most comfortable surface for a rear armrest. see full Volkswagen Tiguan review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Tiguan.