| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Lexus GX and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2010 | |
| Model | Lexus GX | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,780 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,880 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,895 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,209 kg | 1,600 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 66 L | 21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,021 mm | 942 mm | -941 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,461 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,458 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 848 mm | 87 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 927 mm | 0 mm | 927 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,440 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,433 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 632 mm | 0 mm | 632 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,629 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 374 L | 351 L | 23 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,407 L | 12.4 | -11.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,195 L | 12.4 | -10.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Lexus GX
| 2009 Lexus GX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range |
Could use a couple of inches more leg room in the front, and we're only six feet tall. see full Lexus GX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models.
