Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Lexus LS | Volvo V60 | |
Engine | 4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 386 hp@6400 367 lb-ft@4100 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 325 hp@6500 354 lb-ft@3000 |
|
Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan, ext. | 4dr Wagon | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 121.7 in | 109.3 in | 12.4 in |
Length | 205.0 in | 182.5 in | 22.5 in |
Width | 73.8 in | 73.4 in | 0.4 in |
Height | 58.1 in | 58.4 in | -0.3 in |
Curb Weight | 4277 lb. | 3790 lb. | 487 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 22.2 gal. | 17.8 gal. | 4.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.0 in | 38.7 in | -0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.5 in | 57.0 in | 1.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 54.9 in | 0.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 43.7 in | 41.9 in | 1.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 37.4 in | 0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.4 in | 55.2 in | 1.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.5 in | 53.5 in | 2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.7 in | 33.5 in | 3.2 in |
Total Legroom | 80.4 in (over 2 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 18.0 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 | 2.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 18.0 ft3 | 43.8 ft3 | -25.8 ft3 |
2013 Lexus LS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | The Jaguar's sports car-like interior design lends it a sporty character, but at the cost of front seat room, perceived even more than actual. The Lexus feels much roomier. The cushy, well-shaped front seats in the Lexus are among the most comfortable in the class. The Jaguar's are nearly as comfortable, though, and I like the BMW's most of all. Despite a plethora of adjustments, the Audi A8's are firmer and less form-fitting than the others. Move to the back seat, and even in the regular wheelbase cars there's plenty of room and comfort for most adults. The long wheelbase only makes sense if the back seat will often carry tall adults, or people who want limo-like legroom even if they don't have the legs of an NBA center. see full Lexus LS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Lexus LS.
2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review |
2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.