| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Lexus RX and 2013 BMW X1 Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Lexus RX | BMW X1 | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 270 hp@6200 251 lb-ft@4700 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5000 260 lb-ft@1250 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,729 mm | 4,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,844 mm | 1,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,855 kg | 1,690 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 63 L | 10 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,412 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,008 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,450 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 886 mm | 39 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,938 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,085 L | 419 L | -418 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,398 L | 1,351 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Lexus RX
| 2009 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
rear seating and space is grand. front cockpit is a bit short and chopped but acceptable. Front seats are not as comfortable as in our 2001 RX 300. The front seats are minimally acceptable. see full Lexus RX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | BMW makes great sport seats, with support in the right places and power-adjustable side bolsters. This said, those in the X1 Sport Line feel less cushy, and so less overtly comfortable, than I recall from other BMWs. The Evoque's front buckets lack adjustable side bolsters, but feel more luxurious. While the BMW wins on support, the Land Rover wins on comfort. Another tie. Update: when I later had an Evoque for a week its seats felt less comfortable than they had during the dealer test drive. So I'm revising this rating in favor of the BMW. see full BMW X1 review | |
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The BMW X1's interior dimensions also closely resemble those of the previous-generation 3-Series. Up front, there's a little less space to stretch out than in the X3. But abundant headroom. About half of the X1's additional height is over one's head--you sit only a couple inches higher than in the 3-Series. This additional airspace also distinguishes the X1 from the allroad. Rear seat room could be more of an issue. As in the old 3 and the new allroad, a couple of average-sized adults will fit behind a couple more with perhaps an inch or two of clearance for their knees, while a third would be a squeeze. The seat back reclines, but the seat cushion is too low to provide good thigh support. The Evoque is similarly a less-than-ideal choice for four-plus adults taking a long trip. see full BMW X1 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X1.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models.
