Model Year | 2016 | 2018 | |
Model | Lexus RX | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,890 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,895 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,720 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,915 kg | 1,651 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 51 L | 22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,120 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 1,001 mm | 992 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 927 mm | 38 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 521 L | 694 L | -173 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,594 L | 1,489 L | 0 L |
2016 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Lexus RX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Ford C-MAX.